H. Klinkrad, Space debris : models and risk analysis

U. K. Chichester, , 2006.

, Esa disco tool, 2018.

E. H. Hirschel, Basics of Aerothermodynamics, 2005.

J. Anderson, Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics, 2000.

R. N. Cox and L. F. Crabtree, Elements of Hypersonic Aerodynamics, 1965.

Y. Prevereaud, Contribution à la modélisation de la rentrée atmosphérique des débris spatiaux, 2014.

A. B. Strong, Fundamentals of composites manufacturing: materials, methods and applications. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 2008.

T. Schleutker, A. Gülhan, T. Lips, E. Kaschnitz, and B. Bonvoisin, experimental investigations on the demisability of space relevant materials, 2012.

B. Fritsche, G. Koppenwallner, and T. Lips, Re-entry analysis for the atv with scarab, tech. rep., HTG Hyperschall-Technologie Gottingen, 2001.

T. Lips, S. Lohle, T. Marynovwsky, D. Rees, H. Stenbeak-nielsen et al., Assessment of the ATV-1 Re-entry observation campaign for future re-entry missions, Making Safety Matter, Proceedings of the 4th IAASS Conference, vol.680, 2010.

C. Portelli, L. Salotti, L. Anselmo, T. Lips, and A. Tramutola, Bepposax equatorial uncontrolled re-entry, Advances in Space Research, vol.34, issue.5, pp.1029-1037, 2004.

J. Annaloro, S. Galera, P. Kärräng, G. Prigent, T. Lips et al., Comparison between two spacecraft-oriented tools: Pampero and scarab, Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol.4, issue.1, pp.15-21, 2017.

L. Pronzato and W. G. Müller, Design of computer experiments: space filling and beyond, Statistics and Computing, vol.22, pp.681-701, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00685876

, What is space debris, esa faq webpage, 2018.

P. L. , Outer space activities versus outer space, Journal of Space Law, vol.7, issue.2, pp.115-119, 1979.

, ESA's Annual Space Environment Report, 2018.

, Nasa faq webpage, pp.2018-2029

D. J. Kessler and B. G. Cour-palais, Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol.83, issue.A6, pp.2637-2646

H. Klinkrad, B. Fritsche, T. Lips, and G. Koppenwallner, Re-Entry Prediction and On-Ground Risk Estimation, pp.241-288, 2006.

N. Dias, Derivation of the french space operation act requirements in the specifications of the future european launcher ariane 6, Journal of Space Safety Engineering, 2018.

, Loi no 2008-518 du 3 juin 2008 relative aux opérations spatiales

D. J. Kessler, Collisional cascading: The limits of population growth in low earth orbit, Advances in Space Research, vol.11, pp.63-66, 1991.

, Satellite Collision Leaves Significant Debris Clouds, NASA Orbital Debris Program Office, vol.13, pp.1-10, 2009.

J. Dolado-perez, B. Revelin, and R. Di-costanzo, Sensitivity analysis of the long-term evolution of the space debris population in leo, Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol.2, issue.1, pp.12-22, 2015.

J. Dolado-perez, C. Pardini, and L. Anselmo, Review of uncertainty sources affecting the long-term predictions of space debris evolutionary models, Acta Astronautica, vol.113, pp.51-65, 2015.

J. Radtke, S. Mueller, V. Schaus, and E. Stoll, Luca2 -an enhanced long-term utility for collision analysis, 7th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA, 2017.

V. Schaus, J. Radtke, E. Stoll, A. Rossi, C. Colombo et al., Results of reference long-term simulations focussing on passive means to reduce the impact of space debris, 7th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA, 2017.

A. Horstmann and E. Stoll, Investigation of propagation accuracy effects within the modeling of space debris, 7th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA, 2017.

J. Radtke and E. Stoll, Comparing long-term projections of the space debris environment to real world data -looking back to 1990, Acta Astronautica, vol.127, pp.482-490, 2016.

, ESA Space Debris Mitigation Compliance Verification Guidelines, 2015.

H. Klinkrad, Large satellite constellations and related challenges for space debris mitigation, Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol.4, issue.2, pp.59-60, 2017.

B. B. Virgili, J. Dolado, H. Lewis, J. Radtke, H. Krag et al., Risk to space sustainability from large constellations of satellites, Acta Astronautica, vol.126, pp.154-162, 2016.

T. Maury, P. Loubet, J. Ouziel, M. Saint-amand, L. Dariol et al., Towards the integration of orbital space use in life cycle impact assessment, Science of The Total Environment, vol.595, pp.642-650, 2017.

W. Ailor, W. Hallman, G. Steckel, and M. Weaver, Analysis of Reentered Debris and Implications for Survivability Modeling, 4th European Conference on Space Debris, vol.587, p.539, 2005.

B. Fritsche, H. Klinkrad, A. Kashkovsky, and E. Grinberg, Spacecraft disintegration during uncontrolled atmospheric re-entry, Acta Astronautica, vol.47, issue.2, pp.513-522, 2000.

H. Klinkrad, B. Fritsche, and A. Kashkovsky, Prediction of Spacecraft Destruction during Uncontrolled Re-Entries, Spacecraft Structures, Materials and Mechanical Testing, vol.468, p.485, 2001.

C. Finzi, C. Bertorello, G. Pinaud, and J. Bouilly, Simulation of the ariane 5 epc reentry with the fragmentation tool suite, 7th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA, 2017.

B. Fritsche, Uncertainty quantification for re-entry survivability prediction, Space Safety is No Accident, pp.469-478, 2015.

T. Lips, B. Fritsche, R. Kanzler, T. Schleutker, A. Gülhan et al., About the demisability of propellant tanks during atmospheric re-entry from leo, Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol.4, issue.2, pp.99-104, 2017.

, Rocket Body Components Survive Reentry, NASA Orbital Debris Program Office, vol.2, p.4, 1997.

, ESA Re-entry Safety Requirements, 2017.

, Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report, 2008.

A. Soucek, On-orbit satellite szervicing / close proximity operations legal aspects, Cleanspace Industrial Days, ESA (ESTEC), 2018.

, Arrete du 31 mars 2011 relatif a la reglemnetation technique en application du decret n. 2009-643 du 9 juin 2009 relatif aux autorisations delivrees en application de la loi n 2008-518 du 3 juin 2008 relative aux operations spatiales (nor esrr1103737a

P. M. Mehta, M. Kubicek, E. Minisci, and M. Vasile, Sensitivity analysis and probabilistic re-entry modeling for debris using high dimensional model representation based uncertainty treatment, Advances in Space Research, vol.59, issue.1, pp.193-211, 2017.

E. M. Alessi, G. Tommei, I. Holbrough, and J. Beck, Dynamical uncertainty and demisability occurrence for the atmospheric re-entry of soho, Advances in Space Research, vol.62, issue.11, pp.3033-3047, 2018.

C. Tardioli, M. Kubicek, M. Vasile, E. Minisci, and A. Riccardi, Comparison of nonintrusive approaches to uncertainty propagation in orbital mechanics, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Vail CO, 2015.

T. Lips, S. Koppenwallner, L. Bianchi, and H. Klingrad, Risk assessment for destructive reentry, 5th European Conference on Space Debris, 2009.

V. Morand, P. Mercier, G. Prigent, E. Bignon, and P. M. Congedo, CNES activities on polynomial chaos expansion for uncertainty propagation, 27th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01378431

J. Morio and R. Pastel, Sampling technique for launcher impact safety zone estimation, Acta Astronautica, vol.66, issue.5, pp.736-741, 2010.

J. Morio, R. Pastel, and F. L. Gland, Missile target accuracy estimation with importance splitting, Aerospace Science and Technology, vol.25, issue.1, pp.40-44, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00911423

J. Morio and M. Balesdent, Estimation of a launch vehicle stage fallout zone with parametric and non-parametric importance sampling algorithms in presence of uncertain input distributions, Aerospace Science and Technology, vol.52, pp.95-101, 2016.

N. Sissenwine, M. Dubin, and H. Wexler, The us standard atmosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.67, issue.9, pp.3627-3630, 1962.

J. M. Picone, A. E. Hedin, D. P. Drob, and A. C. Aikin, NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), vol.107, p.1468, 2002.

T. I. Gombosi, Gaskinetic theory, 1994.

C. Park, Nonequilibrium hypersonic aerothermodynamics, 1990.

D. C. Wilcox, Turbulence modelling for CFD. DCW Industries, 1993.

A. Viladegut, Enthalpy characterization and assessment of copper catalysis determination in inductively coupled plasma facility, 45th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, p.3107, 2015.

L. Barka, M. Balat-pichelin, J. Sans, J. Annaloro, and P. Omaly, Influence of oxidation and emissivity for metallic alloys space debris during their atmospheric entry, 7th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA, 2017.

B. Fritsche, Modelling the Thermal Decomposition of Carbon Fibre Materials During Re-Entry, 6th European Conference on Space Debris, vol.723, p.60, 2013.

C. Persis, A risk assemssment tool for highly energetic break-up events during the atmospheric re-entry, 2016.

T. Batista-virgili, H. Krag, T. Lips, and E. Pasquale, Simulation of the atv re-entry observations, Making Safety Matter, Proceedings of the 4th IAASS Conference, vol.680, 2010.

B. Los, H. Fraysse, and E. Rapp, Guide des bonnes pratiques maitrise d'un objet spatial, 2014.

B. Lazare, M. H. Arnal, C. Aussilhou, A. Blazquez, and F. Chemama, Electra launch and re-entry safety analysis tool, Making Safety Matter, vol.680, p.46, 2010.

E. Doxsey-whitfield, K. Macmanus, S. B. Adamo, L. Pistolesi, J. Squires et al., Taking advantage of the improved availability of census data: A first look at the gridded population of the world, version 4, Papers in Applied Geography, vol.1, issue.3, pp.226-234, 2015.

R. Pastel, Estimation de probabilités d'évènements rares et de quantiles extrêmes : applications dans le domaine aérospatial, François et Morio, Jérôme Mathématiques et applications Rennes, vol.1, 2012.

J. N. Garcia, Z. Kutalik, K. Cho, and O. Wolkenhauer, Level sets and minimum volume sets of probability density functions, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.34, issue.1, pp.25-47, 2003.

J. Morio, Non-parametric adaptive importance sampling for the probability estimation of a launcher impact position, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol.96, issue.1, pp.178-183, 2008.

C. Parigini, I. Fuentes, D. Bonetti, G. Blanco-arnao, and D. Riley, Debris: an object oriented code for footprint,survivability and risk assessment, 2018.

C. L. Fèvre, H. Fraysse, V. Morand, A. Lamy, C. Cazaux et al., Compliance of disposal orbits with the french space operations act: The good practices and the stela tool, Acta Astronautica, vol.94, issue.1, pp.234-245, 2014.

G. A. Bird, Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows, 1994.

M. G. Kogan, Rarefied Gas Dynamics, 1969.

G. Koppenwallner, B. Fritsche, T. Lips, and H. Klinkrad, Scarab -a Multi-Disciplinary Code for Destruction Analysis of Space-Craft during Re-Entry, Fifth European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, vol.563, p.281, 2005.

J. Annaloro, P. Omaly, V. Rivola, and M. Spel, Elaboration of a new spacecraft-oriented tool: Pampero, Proceedings of the 8th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, 2014.

P. Omaly and M. Spel, DEBRISK, a Tool for Re-Entry Risk Analysis, A Safer Space for Safer World, vol.699, p.70, 2012.

J. A. Fay, Theory of stagnation point heat transfer in dissociated air, Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, vol.25, issue.2, pp.73-85, 1958.

R. D. Klett, Drag coefficients and heating ratios for right circular cylinders in freemolecular and continuum flow from mach 10 to 30, tech. rep, 1964.

R. Detra, Generalized heat transfer formulas and graphs for nose cone re-entry into the atmosphere, ARS Journal, vol.31, issue.3, pp.318-321, 1961.

J. Dobarco-otero, R. Smith, K. Bledsoe, R. Delaune, W. Rochelle et al., The object reentry survival analysis tool (orsat)-version 6.0 and its application to spacecraft entry, Proceedings of the 56th Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and International Institute of Space Law, IAC-05-B6, vol.3, pp.17-21, 2005.

J. Annaloro, S. Galera, P. Karrang, Y. Prevereaud, J. Verant et al., Space debris atmospheric entry prediction with spacecraft-oriented tools, 7th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA, 2017.

Z. Wu, R. Hu, X. Qu, X. Wang, and Z. Wu, Space debris reentry analysis methods and tools, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol.24, issue.4, pp.387-395, 2011.

J. Annaloro, S. Galera, C. Thiebaut, and P. Omaly, Latest improvements on the cnes spacecraft-oriented tool: Pampero, ESA Industrial Clean Space Days, ESA, 2018.

M. Frank, M. Weaver, and R. Baker, A probabilistic paradigm for spacecraft random reentry disassembly, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol.90, issue.2, pp.148-161, 2005.

T. Lips, Re-entry analysis of terrasar-x with scarab, 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law, p.5, 2003.

T. Lips, V. Wartemann, G. Koppenwallner, H. Klinkrad, D. Alwes et al., Comparison of Orsat and Scarab Reentry Survival Results, 4th European Conference on Space Debris, vol.587, p.533, 2005.

T. Lips, Equivalent Re-Entry Breakup Altitude and Fragment List, 6th European Conference on Space Debris, vol.723, p.54, 2013.

J. Merrifield, J. Beck, G. Markelov, P. Leyland, and R. Molina, Aerothermal heating methodology in the spacecraft aerothermal model (sam), Space Safety is No Accident, pp.463-468, 2015.

J. Beck, J. Merrifield, G. Markelov, I. Holbrough, and R. Molina, Verification and application of the sam re-entry model, Space Safety is No Accident, pp.437-443, 2015.

P. T. Summers, Y. Chen, C. M. Rippe, B. Allen, A. P. Mouritz et al., Overview of aluminum alloy mechanical properties during and after fires, Fire Science Reviews, vol.4, p.3, 2015.

D. Leiser, S. Loehle, F. Zander, R. Choudhury, D. R. Buttsworth et al., Spacecraft material tests under aerothermal and mechanical reentry loads, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019.

M. Balat-pichelin, J. Sans, E. Bêche, V. Flaud, and J. Annaloro, Oxidation and emissivity of inconel 718 alloy as potential space debris during its atmospheric entry, Materials Characterization, vol.127, pp.379-390, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02325745

F. Sanson and C. Frueh, Quantifying uncertainties in signal position in non-resolved object images: Application to space object observation, Advances in Space Research, vol.63, issue.8, pp.2436-2454, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01968808

F. Sanson and C. Frueh, Noise quantification in optical observations of resident space objects for probability of detection and likelihood, AAS/AIAA Astrodynamic Specialist Conference, pp.15-634, 2015.

F. Sanson, N. Villedieu, F. Panerai, O. Chazot, P. M. Congedo et al., Quantification of uncertainty on the catalytic property of reusable thermal protection materials from high enthalpy experiments, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol.82, pp.414-423, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01398173

F. Sanson, F. Panerai, T. E. Magin, and P. M. Congedo, Robust reconstruction of the catalytic properties of thermal protection materials from sparse high-enthalpy facility experimental data, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol.96, pp.482-492, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01742595

R. C. Smith, Uncertainty quantification: theory, implementation, and applications, vol.12, 2013.

G. Iaccarino, Uncertainty quantification in computational science, 2014.

G. Shafer, A mathematical theory of evidence, vol.42, 1976.

F. P. Coolen, On the use of imprecise probabilities in reliability, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol.20, issue.3, pp.193-202, 2004.

R. Schöbi and B. Sudret, Uncertainty propagation of p-boxes using sparse polynomial chaos expansions, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.339, pp.307-327, 2017.

B. D. Finetti, Theory of Probability: A critical introductory treatment, 1990.

O. P. Le-maître and O. M. Knio, Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification. Scientific Computation, 2010.

R. E. Bellman and S. E. Dreyfus, Applied dynamic programming, 2015.

R. E. Caflisch, Monte carlo and quasi-monte carlo methods, Acta Numerica, vol.7, pp.1-49, 1998.

M. D. Mckay, R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, vol.21, pp.239-245, 1979.

M. Stein, Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling, Technometrics, vol.29, issue.2, pp.143-151, 1987.

D. Xiu and G. E. Karniadakis, The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol.24, pp.619-644, 2002.

R. G. Ghanem and P. D. Spanos, Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, 1991.

W. Gautschi, Orthogonal Polynomials: Quadrature , and Approximation, 2004.

M. T. Reagan, H. N. Najm, R. G. Ghanem, and O. M. Knio, Uncertainty quantification in reacting-flow simulations through non-intrusive spectral projection, Combustion and Flame, vol.132, issue.3, pp.545-555, 2003.

P. Congedo, C. Corre, and J. Martinez, Shape optimization of an airfoil in a bzt flow with multiple-source uncertainties, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol.200, issue.1, pp.216-232, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00549220

G. Blatman and B. Sudret, Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.230, issue.6, pp.2345-2367, 2011.

D. Xiu, Numerical methods for Stochastic Computations: a spectral method approach, 2010.

J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, The elements of statistical learning, vol.1, 2001.

K. Tang, P. M. Congedo, and R. Abgrall, Adaptive surrogate modeling by anova and sparse polynomial dimensional decomposition for global sensitivity analysis in fluid simulation, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.314, pp.557-589, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01286721

C. M. Bishop, Pattern recognition and machine learning, 2006.

R. K. Tripathy and I. Bilionis, Deep uq: Learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.375, pp.565-588, 2018.

S. Karumuri, R. Tripathy, I. Bilionis, and J. Panchal, Simulator-free Solution of High-Dimensional Stochastic Elliptic Partial Differential Equations using Deep Neural Networks, 2019.

N. Cressie, Statistics for spatial data, 2015.

C. E. Rasmussen, Gaussian processes for machine learning, 2006.

I. Bilionis and N. Zabaras, Multi-output local gaussian process regression: Applications to uncertainty quantification, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.231, issue.17, pp.5718-5746, 2012.

J. E. Oakley and A. O'hagan, Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a bayesian approach, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), vol.66, issue.3, pp.751-769, 2004.

A. F. Cortesi, G. Jannoun, and P. M. Congedo, Kriging-sparse polynomial dimensional decomposition surrogate model with adaptive refinement, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.380, pp.212-242, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01914383

R. Tripathy, I. Bilionis, and M. Gonzalez, Gaussian processes with built-in dimensionality reduction: Applications to high-dimensional uncertainty propagation, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.321, pp.191-223, 2016.

P. G. Constantine, E. Dow, and Q. Wang, Active subspace methods in theory and practice: applications to kriging surfaces, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol.36, issue.4, pp.1500-1524, 2014.

K. Konakli and B. Sudret, Polynomial meta-models with canonical low-rank approximations: Numerical insights and comparison to sparse polynomial chaos expansions, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.321, pp.1144-1169, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01432141

A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni et al., Global sensitivity analysis: the primer, 2008.

B. Iooss and P. Lemaître, A Review on Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods, pp.101-122, 2015.

I. Sobol, Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation, Methodological advances and innovative applications of sensitivity analysis, vol.79, pp.187-193, 2001.

A. Saltelli, P. Annoni, I. Azzini, F. Campolongo, M. Ratto et al., Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. design and estimator for the total sensitivity index, Computer Physics Communications, vol.181, issue.2, pp.259-270, 2010.

A. Saltelli, Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices, Computer Physics Communications, vol.145, issue.2, pp.280-297, 2002.

F. Gamboa, A. Janon, T. Klein, A. Lagnoux, and C. Prieur, Statistical inference for sobol pick-freeze monte carlo method, Statistics, vol.50, issue.4, pp.881-902, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00804668

A. Owen and C. Prieur, On shapley value for measuring importance of dependent inputs, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, vol.5, issue.1, pp.986-1002, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01379188

G. Chastaing, F. Gamboa, and C. Prieur, Generalized sobol sensitivity indices for dependent variables: numerical methods, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol.85, issue.7, pp.1306-1333, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00801628

F. Gamboa, A. Janon, T. Klein, and A. Lagnoux, Sensitivity indices for multivariate outputs, Comptes Rendus Mathematique, vol.351, issue.7, pp.307-310, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00800847

W. A. Huber, why risk is not variance: An expository note, Risk Analysis, vol.30, issue.3, pp.327-328, 2010.

L. A. Cox and J. , Why risk is not variance: An expository note, Risk Analysis, vol.28, issue.4, pp.925-928, 2008.

E. Borgonovo, W. Castaings, and S. Tarantola, Moment independent importance measures: New results and analytical test cases, Risk Analysis, vol.31, issue.3, pp.404-428, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halsde-00683555

E. Borgonovo, W. Castaings, and S. Tarantola, Model emulation and moment-independent sensitivity analysis: An application to environmental modelling, Environmental Modelling and Software, vol.34, pp.105-115, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halsde-00683551

S. D. Veiga, Global sensitivity analysis with dependence measures, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol.85, issue.7, pp.1283-1305, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00903283

F. Gamboa, T. Klein, and A. Lagnoux, Sensitivity analysis based on cramér-von mises distance, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, vol.6, issue.2, pp.522-548, 2018.

J. Fort, T. Klein, and N. Rachdi, New sensitivity analysis subordinated to a contrast, Communications in Statistics -Theory and Methods, vol.45, issue.15, pp.4349-4364, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00821308

R. Schobi, B. Sudret, and J. Wiart, Polynomial-chaos-based kriging, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, vol.5, issue.2, pp.171-193, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01432195

C. C. Aggarwal, Data classification: algorithms and applications, 2014.

J. C. Platt, Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods, Advances in large margin classifiers, pp.61-74, 1999.

C. K. Williams and D. Barber, Bayesian classification with gaussian processes, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol.20, pp.1342-1351, 1998.

T. P. Minka, A family of algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference, 2001.

. Gpy, GPy: A gaussian process framework in python

N. Cressie, The origins of kriging, Mathematical Geology, vol.22, issue.3, pp.239-252, 1990.

M. Stein, Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for kriging, 2012.

T. A. Plate, Accuracy versus interpretability in flexible modeling: Implementing a tradeoff using gaussian process models, Behaviormetrika, vol.26, issue.1, pp.29-50, 1999.

W. Betz, I. Papaioannou, and D. Straub, Numerical methods for the discretization of random fields by means of the Karhunen-Loève expansion, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol.271, pp.109-129, 2014.

G. Matheron, The intrinsic random functions and their applications, Advances in Applied Probability, vol.5, issue.3, pp.439-468, 1973.

D. Krige, A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the witwatersrand, J. of the Chem., Metal. and Mining Soc. of South Africa, vol.52, issue.6, pp.119-139, 1951.

G. Perrin, C. Soize, S. Marque-pucheu, and J. Garnier, Nested polynomial trends for the improvement of gaussian process-based predictors, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.346, pp.389-402, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01298861

L. Pronzato, Minimax and maximin space-filling designs : some properties and methods for construction, Societe Francaise de Statistique, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01496712

M. D. Mckay, R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover, Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, vol.21, pp.239-245, 1979.

B. Iooss, L. Boussouf, V. Feuillard, and A. Marel, Numerical studies of the metamodel fitting and validation processes, International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements, vol.3, pp.11-21, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00444666

E. R. Van-dam, B. Husslage, D. D. Hertog, and H. Melissen, Maximin latin hypercube designs in two dimensions, Operations Research, vol.55, issue.1, pp.158-169, 2007.

B. Tang, Orthogonal array-based latin hypercubes, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.88, issue.424, pp.1392-1397, 1993.

P. J. Zemroch, Cluster analysis as an experimental design generator, with application to gasoline blending experiments, Technometrics, vol.28, issue.1, pp.39-49, 1986.

B. A. Flury, Principal points, Biometrika, vol.77, pp.33-41, 1990.

R. Lekivetz and B. Jones, Fast flexible space-filling designs for nonrectangular regions, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol.31, issue.5, pp.829-837, 2015.

P. Gilles, Optimal vector quantization: from signal processing to clustering and numerical probability, CEMRACS, 2017.

S. Lloyd, Least squares quantization in pcm, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol.28, pp.129-137, 1982.

T. Kohonen, Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps, Biological Cybernetics, vol.43, pp.59-69, 1982.

D. R. Jones, M. Schonlau, and W. J. Welch, Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, Journal of Global optimization, vol.13, issue.4, pp.455-492, 1998.

B. Echard, N. Gayton, M. Lemaire, and N. Relun, A combined importance sampling and kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol.111, pp.232-240, 2013.

D. Bursztyn and D. M. Steinberg, Comparison of designs for computer experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol.136, issue.3, pp.1103-1119, 2006.

K. Ritter, Average-case analysis of numerical problems, 2007.

J. Sacks, W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, and H. P. Wynn, Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statistical science, pp.409-423, 1989.

C. Currin, T. Mitchell, M. Morris, and D. Ylvisaker, Bayesian prediction of deterministic functions, with applications to the design and analysis of computer experiments, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.86, issue.416, pp.953-963, 1991.

T. J. Mitchell, An algorithm for the construction of "d-optimal" experimental designs, Technometrics, vol.16, issue.2, pp.203-210, 1974.

M. C. Shewry and H. P. Wynn, Maximum entropy sampling, Journal of Applied Statistics, vol.14, issue.2, pp.165-170, 1987.

J. Sacks, S. B. Schiller, and W. J. Welch, Designs for computer experiments, vol.31, pp.41-47, 1989.

D. J. Mackay, Information-based objective functions for active data selection, Neural Computation, vol.4, issue.4, pp.590-604, 1992.

A. Krause, A. Singh, and C. Guestrin, Near-optimal sensor placements in gaussian processes: Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies, Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), vol.9, pp.235-284, 2008.

A. Gorodetsky and Y. Marzouk, Mercer kernels and integrated variance experimental design: Connections between gaussian process regression and polynomial approximation, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, vol.4, issue.1, pp.796-828, 2016.

N. Ramakrishnan, C. Bailey-kellogg, S. Tadepalli, and V. N. Pandey, Gaussian processes for active data mining of spatial aggregates, Proceedings of the 2005 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp.427-438, 2005.

J. Beck and S. Guillas, Sequential design with mutual information for computer experiments (mice): emulation of a tsunami model, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, vol.4, issue.1, pp.739-766, 2016.

B. Gauthier and L. Pronzato, Approximation of imse-optimal designs via quadrature rules and spectral decomposition, Communications in Statistics -Simulation and Computation, vol.45, issue.5, pp.1600-1612, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00936681

D. A. Cohn, Neural network exploration using optimal experiment design, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol.6, pp.679-686, 1994.

R. B. Gramacy and H. K. Lee, Adaptive design and analysis of supercomputer experiments, Technometrics, vol.51, issue.2, pp.130-145, 2009.

B. Settles, Active learning literature survey, tech. rep, 2010.

D. D. Lewis and W. A. Gale, A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers, SIGIR'94, pp.3-12, 1994.

N. Roy and A. Mccallum, Toward optimal active learning through sampling estimation of error reduction, ICML, 2001.

T. M. Hospedales, S. Gong, and T. Xiang, Finding rare classes: Active learning with generative and discriminative models, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol.25, pp.374-386, 2013.

D. Pelleg and A. W. Moore, Active learning for anomaly and rare-category detection, Advances in neural information processing systems, pp.1073-1080, 2005.

S. Amaral, D. Allaire, and K. Willcox, A decomposition-based approach to uncertainty analysis of feed-forward multicomponent systems, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.100, issue.13, pp.982-1005, 2014.

P. G. Constantine and E. T. Phipps, A lanczos method for approximating composite functions, Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol.218, issue.24, pp.11751-11762, 2012.

P. G. Constantine, E. T. Phipps, and T. M. Wildey, Efficient uncertainty propagation for network multiphysics systems, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.99, issue.3, pp.183-202, 2014.

M. Arnst, R. Ghanem, E. Phipps, and J. Red-horse, Dimension reduction in stochastic modeling of coupled problems, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.92, issue.11, pp.940-968, 2012.

S. Dubreuil, N. Bartoli, C. Gogu, T. Lefebvre, and J. M. Colomer, Extreme value oriented random field discretization based on an hybrid polynomial chaos expansion -kriging approach, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol.332, pp.540-571, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01712026

S. Dubreuil, N. Bartoli, T. Lefebvre, and C. Gogu, Efficient global multidisciplinary optimization based on surrogate models, Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, pp.367-377, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02056874

X. Chen, B. Ng, Y. Sun, and C. Tong, A flexible uncertainty quantification method for linearly coupled multi-physics systems, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.248, pp.383-401, 2013.

A. Mittal, X. Chen, C. Tong, and G. Iaccarino, A flexible uncertainty propagation framework for general multiphysics systems, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, vol.4, issue.1, pp.218-243, 2016.

S. Sankararaman, Uncertainty quantification and integration in engineering systems, 2012.

A. C. Damianou and N. D. Lawrence, , pp.207-215, 2013.

A. Girard, C. E. Rasmussen, J. Quinonero-candela, R. Murray-smith, O. Winther et al., Multiple-step ahead prediction for non linear dynamic systems-a gaussian process treatment with propagation of the uncertainty, Advances in neural information processing systems, vol.15, pp.529-536, 2003.

S. Marque-pucheu, G. Perrin, and J. Garnier, Efficient sequential experimental design for surrogate modeling of nested codes, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01657827

I. Sobol, On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, vol.7, issue.4, pp.86-112, 1967.

T. J. Santner, B. J. Williams, and W. I. Notz, The design and analysis of computer experiments, 2013.

C. Ko, J. Lee, and M. Queyranne, An exact algorithm for maximum entropy sampling, Operations Research, vol.43, issue.4, pp.684-691, 1995.

R. Storn and K. V. Price, Differential evolution -a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, J. Global Optimization, vol.11, pp.341-359, 1997.

T. Ishigami and T. Homma, An importance quantification technique in uncertainty analysis for computer models, Proceedings. First International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, pp.398-403, 1990.

C. Bertorello, C. Finzi, G. Pinaud, L. Rhidane, and J. Bouilly, Adryans R v5.0 -a 1-dimension object oriented survivability tool, 7th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA, 2017.

D. Delorme and S. Lirola, Caracteristation de l' environement naturel pour un lanceur spatial decollant du centre spatial guyanais (csg), 2013.

T. E. Oliphant, A bayesian perspective on estimating mean, variance, and standarddeviation from data, 2006.

P. Brémaud, Markov chains: Gibbs fields, Monte Carlo simulation, and queues, vol.31, 2013.

C. F. Karney, Algorithms for geodesics, Journal of Geodesy, vol.87, pp.43-55, 2013.

F. Cadini, F. Santos, and E. Zio, An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.131, pp.109-117, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01787034

B. Echard, N. Gayton, and M. Lemaire, Ak-mcs: An active learning reliability method combining kriging and monte carlo simulation, Structural Safety, vol.33, issue.2, pp.145-154, 2011.

V. Dubourg, B. Sudret, and F. Deheeger, Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol.33, pp.47-57, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00590604

N. Razaaly and P. M. Congedo, Novel algorithm using active metamodel learning and importance sampling: Application to multiple failure regions of low probability, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.368, pp.92-114, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01550770

B. Fritsche and S. Stemmens, Case studies for uncertainty quantification of a highfidelityspacecraft oriented break-up tool, 8th Europeans Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, ESA, 2015.

B. Shahriari, K. Swersky, Z. Wang, R. P. Adams, and N. De-freitas, Taking the human out of the loop: A review of bayesian optimization, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol.104, pp.148-175, 2016.

P. Hennig and C. J. Schuler, Entropy search for information-efficient global optimization, Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol.13, pp.1809-1837, 2012.

W. Vesely, F. Goldberg, N. Roberts, and D. Haasl, Fault tree handbook, 1981.

C. M. Bishop, Neural networks for pattern recognition, 1995.

M. Raissi, Deep hidden physics models: Deep learning of nonlinear partial differential equations, Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol.19, issue.25, pp.1-24, 2018.

M. Raissi and G. E. Karniadakis, Hidden physics models: Machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.357, pp.125-141, 2018.

C. Park, J. Z. Huang, and Y. Ding, A computable plug-in estimator of minimum volume sets for novelty detection, Operations Research, vol.58, issue.5, pp.1469-1480, 2010.

G. Allaire, Shape optimization by the homogenization method, vol.146, 2012.

F. W. Matting, Approximate bridging relations in the transitional regime between continuum and free-molecule flows, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol.8, issue.1, pp.35-40, 1971.